Click here to for more on Fess Parker's DoubleTree Resort.

Click here to for more on the Spirit of Small Business Awards Luncheon

Columns

Harbor Freight battle is a father-son feud for the ages

During the past 15 years, a tool and hardware distributor in Camarillo called Central Purchasing exploded into one of the largest private companies in the Tri-Counties as it exploited new sales channels online, in broadcast media and at 300 retail stores.

 
Muscle car supplier could have region’s biggest lease this year

In what may be the largest lease deal in the Tri-Counties to date this year, Dynacorn International leased 98,952 square feet of industrial space at 4030 Via Pescador in Camarillo. The seven-year lease is valued at more than $3.8 million, according to NAI Capital’s Ventura County office, which represented the lessee.

 

Syndicate

Home
Mexican ex-president calls for free trade, legal drugs Print E-mail
Written by Marlize van Romburgh   
Friday, 19 February 2010

The United States needs to strengthen its economic alliances with Mexico and Canada to compete with emerging markets in Asia, former Mexican President Vicente Fox said Feb. 19 in Santa Barbara.

“I hope that the present [U.S.] administration has vision and learns that to recover — to fully recover — the competitiveness of this nation and the future growth of gross domestic product, we have to work together. We have to have a vision of a NAFTA-plus,” he said.

Speaking at the annual Westmont College President's breakfast, Fox said the U.S., Mexico and Canada need to refocus on the North America Free Trade Agreement to stem job losses to Asia. He also spoke about the U.S.' role in helping curb Mexican drug wars and the effects of the global financial crisis on Latin America.

NAFTA, enacted in 1994, eliminated tariffs on many imports between Mexico and the U.S. and sought to eliminate non-tariff trade barriers between North American countries.

“Today Mexico buys more product from the United States than do Germany, Italy and France together. We are a very solid partner of this nation,” Fox said.

Fox outlined his vision for a “NAFTA-plus” — a beefed-up version of the current agreement that would include more integration between the three North American countries. At the breakfast, Fox said that strengthening NAFTA is imperative for North America to be able to compete with China and India.

“That's why we — the U.S., Mexico and Canada — created this great organization of NAFTA,” Fox said. “To try and stop job loss to Asia.”

He cited a forecast by Goldman Sachs that predicts that China will supersede the U.S. as the leading world economy by 2040. The U.S. will come in second place, followed by India, Japan and Mexico.

“What we see here is that three of the nations that are going to lead on that list come from Asia,” Fox said. “We see those emerging economies getting stronger and stronger. We're going through a power shift from the West to the East.”

Drug wars

If it wants to end drug-related violence in Mexico, the United States should consider legalizing drugs, Fox said. The comments generated a low murmur and sporadic applause from some portions of the breakfast's audience.

Mexico finds itself jammed between drug producers in South America and drug consumers in the U.S., Fox said. He urged the United States to continue helping fight drug-related crime and violence in his country. “It's a shared responsibility and a shared problem,” he said.

The flood of drug-related killings that peaked over the past two years has further damaged a broken Mexican economy, said Fox, who was succeeded by Felipe Calderón, the country’s current president. “Tourism is not flowing to the nation as it used to; foreign investment is not coming like it used to,” Fox said.

“We need to end the war,” he said. “It's time to debate legalizing drugs,” he said, adding, “Then maybe we can separate violence from what is a health problem.”

Truck driver to president

Fox is a former president of Coca-Cola's Mexican division, a position he ascended to after starting as a truck driver for the company. Following his success in business, Fox entered politics and was governor of the Mexican state of Guanajuato for four years.

His presidential election in 2000 was a historic one for the nation, ending the 71-year reign of the then-dominant Institutional Revolutionary Party and peacefully ushering in democratic rule. His legacy is widely regarded as one promoting freedom and economic reform.

While he has at times been criticized in his home country for acceding to U.S. interests too often, Fox is credited with reducing Mexico's foreign debt and lowering the country's inflation, as well as encouraging foreign investment and trade.

Are you a subscriber? If not, sign up today for a four-week FREE trial or subscribe and receive the Book of Lists free with your purchase.

Comments
Add NewSearch
malcolm kyle - Vicente Fox is so right on thi | 2010-02-19 13:10:04
The incredibly high prices of these drugs, which is caused by prohibition, force many drug addicts to turn to robbery in order to pay for their drugs. Legalized regulation would drop drug prices to an affordable level. Drug addicts would no longer then need to rob/assault innocent people in order to support their drug habit. This violence against innocent people would end if drugs were legally regulated.
At present, the prisons and jails are full with nonviolent people. --Nearly 50% of all people in prison and jail are not addicts, but users serving time for nonviolent drug charges. To house just one prisoner for one year costs the taxpayer more than 40 thousand dollars! The result; Drug use has increased to a level where drugs are now easily obtained even in prison cells; there is not a single prison in the whole nation that does not have a serious drug problem!
Terrorists, organized criminals, and corrupt secret government agencies (see above) thrive off the enormous profits generated by drug prohibition. These organizations are responsible for thousands of murders. Many of the people killed or hurt are innocent people who "get in the way" These violent organizations will never be put out of business unless drugs are legally regulated.
Underground illegal cocaine and methamphetamine labs use toxic chemicals to produce those drugs. The wastes are recklessly dumped in forests and streams. These highly toxic chemicals are causing major environmental damage in South American rain-forests and now also in the US national forests. This environmental destruction will stop only if drugs are legally regulated.
Thousands of inner-city youths drop out of school to make enormous profits by selling drugs. This "quick & easy" cash incentive to drop out of school would end if drugs were legally regulated.
In spite of what you may have been led to believe, keeping drugs illegal does not keep drugs away from children. Drugs are easily obtainable in almost every school in the US. Legalized regulation would put schoolyard drug dealers out of business! There would be less drugs in US schools if drugs were legally regulated.
Prohibition is not regulation; prohibition is a dangerous "free-for-all" where all the profits go to the most dangerous elements threatening a free and democratic society.
It really doesn't have to be this way!
newageblues | 2010-02-19 14:54:55
Excellent post, malcolm kyle. I don't think I ever heard one point made so clearly: "Thousands of inner-city youths drop out of school to make enormous profits by selling drugs. This "quick & easy" cash incentive to drop out of school would end if drugs were legally regulated". Awareness of the violence this causes is well known, but somehow I never quite made the connection that it directly affects school dropout rates (and indirectly too thru the education lite culture that is created with 'successful' drug dealers as stars), and I don't think decision makers have either.
I do want to add that cannabis prohibition messes with our environment too, it guarantees there will be cannabis grow ops in remote sections of national parks (making them scary to visit) and/or using harmful chemicals to increase profits.
Confining the discussion to cannabis for a moment, I'd really like to know how anyone can think it is wise or fair to make cannabis users criminals, when alcohol is so far more dangerous to life and limb (and fetus). It's not an opinion that alcohol is much more deadly than cannabis, it's the simple truth. If either of these two substances is going to be illegal, it damn well should be alcohol!
Apples&Oranges - Apples&Oranges | 2010-02-19 16:02:02
Not that it has anything to do with President Fox's speech, but comparing alcohol (legal) deaths to cannabis (illegal) deaths is theoretical -- apples to oranges. We can only speculate about the what the statistics might be if cannabis were legal and as available as alcohol. More people die from alcohol (drunk driving, poisoning) because it's widely available. Many people consume alcohol; far fewer cannabis. All speculative arguments about the physiological affects aside, statistically these aren't even the same fruit.
Greg | 2010-02-19 20:00:01
There has never been a single recorded death directly related to cannabis use in history. So in a way you are correct its an apples to oranges comparison.
Phowa - Appalled | 2010-02-19 20:18:28
To suggest the legalization of drugs is appalling! This man has been the worst nightmare for Mexico...he is the one that opened the door to the violence that has devastated this country by allowing drug-lords to do whatever they pleased! Shame on you Fox!
newageblues | 2010-02-19 22:30:21
Sorry, apples and oranges, I don't buy it. Of course you're right that one reason more people die from alcohol than cannabis is because a lot more people use alcohol. But that only begins to explain the vast disparity in deaths and serious injury caused by alcohol vs. those caused by cannabis. When is the last time you heard of cannabis impairment leading to death, it is all but non-existent (Not cannabis and alcohol or some other drug, someone who only used cannabis. And of course black market related violence is a separate issue, prohibition and greed are responsible for that)?
How many people do you think cannabis kills each year in this country? It would have to be quite a few thousand to make it as dangerous as alcohol. Where is the evidence anything remotely close to that is happening? Law enforcement would love to report cannabis related catastrophes if they could.
newageblues | 2010-02-20 21:56:58
I don't know what apples and oranges means by theoretical and speculative. Estimates of Americans killed by alcohol range from 50,000 upwards. If premature deaths to which it contributed are counted, the number is much higher. And alcohol related traffic crashes and other violence also maim very large numbers of people each year. After 70+ years of national cannabis prohibition, where are any statistics that show the many millions of cannabis users to be anywhere near as dangerous to innocent people or themselves on or off the road? Law enforcement would love to provide them if they had them. There's nothing speculative about alcohol being the drug of choice for child molester and domestic violence fiends, and I don't think anyone wants to claim there is a fetal marijuana syndrome to compare with fetal alcohol syndrome. You can't overdose and die on cannabis, though every once in a while someone chokes to death trying to swallow their stash to avoid arrest. Face it, alcohol in the wrong hands is a far bigger problem than cannabis in the wrong hands, and the law needs to respect that reality
newageblues | 2010-02-20 22:10:40
I'll keep it short and sweet, apples and oranges, alcohol has a relationship to violence that cannabis simply doesn't have, keep a log of alcohol only and cannabis only impairment related catastrophes that you hear or read about for a while, like I did for many years, and you'll see for yourself, even after taking into account the much greater number of people who use alcohol. Prohibition black market related catastrophes don't count since they are caused by prohibition and ending prohibition is the only way to stop them, just as it was during alcohol prohibition. Ok, so it wasn't short and probably not sweet, but I tried.
BillBob | 2010-02-21 06:11:43
Vincente Fox has it right. Legalization and regulation of Drugs are the ONLY solution. Prohibition always fails miserably, it's been proven many times before.
newageblues | 2010-02-21 13:37:50
Arguing that drug policy, and cannabis policy specifically should be changed has everything to do with Fox's speech, he said we should consider legalizing drugs. I'm seconding the motion especially in the case of cannabis. Forcing people to use alcohol instead of cannabis kills, and not only because of black market violence.
don freeman - sculpture | 2010-02-21 23:35:13
legalizing drugs may also have a possitive effect on Afgany and mideast war oh no! legalize dope and win the war? who knew....
Jason - Europe? | 2010-02-22 11:54:23
I have been to a couple of the countries in Europe which have legalized hard drugs and the results are not pretty. They have addicts and junkies shooting up in the subway stations, and dying on the streets. If we feel that hard drugs are wrong for our children, what message is it going to send to them when we make them legal? The fact that alcohol is dangerous and should be illegal does not make a good argument for legalizing hard drugs.
Margie Kohlhaas - Goleta Gal | 2010-02-22 14:26:28
I attended the Westmont President's Breakfast and heard Vincente's speech. He never mentioned legalizing drugs. He wants to fight the war on drugs and end the building of walls between our nations. He'd also like to profit from the oil reserves in Mexico & off the coast. Not once did he mention legalizing drugs. He's very conservative and would like the end the useage of drugs...pay attention people and Yes, I'm sure cannibis has contributed to many deaths.
Storm Crow - Want the medical facts? | 2010-02-23 11:52:30
Part of the problem with cannabis is that there has been SO MUCH misinformation spread around about it. To put it bluntly- we've been lied to a lot about this safe medicinal herb!

Would you like to read some honest scientific studies (and news articles about them) to get the facts? I've already done the plodding through PubMed, WebMD and other reliable sources to find them for you. Just run a search for "Granny Storm Crow's MMJ Reference List" and educate yourself!

Don't take my word, or anyone else's, that cannabis is (or is not) medicine- read the facts in the studies and make a rational, informed decision about it! Educate yourself!

Jason and A&O, please read the "Safety" and "Mortality Rates" sections of my list. You really need to get an education about cannabis- other than what you learned in your 5th grade DARE class! The truth about cannabis is quite different than what you believe. Accept my challenge- read just the titles in my list, then come back and tell us what you think!
Bone | 2010-02-25 08:03:04
check out the film The Union.its hard to argue with the truth.you can watch it free online.if you have ANY common sense,you will be appaled.......
Have something to say? Submit a comment to this story.
Your Name: * (required)
Email: * (required but will not be published)
Your Title:
 
 
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

Last Updated ( Friday, 19 February 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Joomla Templates by Joomlashack